Territory of Hawaii v. Ota
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
PETERS, J.
The same situation developed here as in the case of Ter. v. Crowley, 34 Haw. 774.
As a comment upon the acts of a public officer seeking re-election, the publication was qualifiedly privileged. Where a publication is qualifiedly privileged good motives and justifiable ends are presumed, providing the statements of fact contained therein are true. If the statements of fact contained in the publication are true the defense permitted by R. L. H. 1935, § 6055, is complete. This is so because the facts showing malice under R. L. H. 1935, § 6054, are not present.
The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hawthorne v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. LundhighIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- S. v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.