Sepetowski v. St. Louis Transit Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Row. S. P. Spencer, Judge. (1) The objection to the introduction of any evidence under the second count of the petition, which was identical with the first count, save that the first was for damage to property, and the second for personal injury, both growing out of the same occurrence, should have been sustained. Trammell v. Vaughan, 158 Mo. 214. (2) The demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Row. S. P. Spencer, Judge. (1) The objection to the introduction of any evidence under the second count of the petition, which was identical with the first count, save that the first was for damage to property, and the second for personal injury, both growing out of the same occurrence, should have been sustained. Trammell v. Vaughan, 158 Mo. 214. (2) The demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained. The plaintiff could have seen and heard the approaching ear for several blocks, had he looked and listened, and could, by ordinary care, have…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
(after stating the facts as above.) — 1. The evidence is that Wash street, in the city of St. Louis, runs east and west and is forty-eight feet wide with a single street railway track laid in its center over which defendant operates street cars from east to west propelled by electric power; that Thirteenth street is sixty feet wide, runs north and south and crosses Wash street between High and Fourteenth streets; that Wash street, east of Thirteenth, is brnlt up for several blocks even with the building line; that Wash street is straight and comparatively level east of Thirteenth street for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morgan v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Holwerson v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Christian v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Jackson v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Hutchinson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Sluder v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Welton v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- McFern v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- State Ex Rel. Vogt v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.