Legal Opinion · Dissent

National Labor Relations Board v. Sidney Friedman, Comptroller, and Local 108, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 23, 1965No. 15324Published

1DissentMcLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) .

This appeal arises out of a complaint by the Board on the charge of the union involved that respondents are guilty of unfair labor practice. Virtually all of respondents’ records from 1961 to and including 1964 were subpoenaed by the Board at the request of the General Counsel for the hearing before the Trial Examiner. It developed that these were not intended at that time for specific trial use. The admitted purpose of having the records brought in was to permit the union attorneys, experts and other union personnel to examine them prior to trial at their private leisure in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Anchor Rome Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Jackson Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  5. Adams v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API