Mabie v. Sines
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clare. (Hart, J.) Attachment proceedings under log-lien law. Defendant company brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendants Sines & Wilson for the hire of a team used in and about the manufacture of lumber by Sines & Wilson for the defendant the Lansing Lumber Company. The lumber company is joined as owner of the property, and a lien is sought to be established upon the lumber manufactured.
The evidence shows that in September, 1890, the plaintiff sold to Sines & Wilson the team in question, under an agreement that the team should remain the property of the plaintiff until paid for, and that Sines & Wilson should make a payment of $50 within 30 days, and with a further provision…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hogan v. CushingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Martin v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- McCrillis v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1852
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phillips v. AtwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- McKinnon v. Red River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. ReinmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- State Ex Rel. Winebrenner v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Southwestern Dredging Corp. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.