Atkins v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Defendant appeals the trial court’s imposition of costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985).
Defendant’s first point is the argument that the application of section 27.3455 violated the ex post facto provisions of the United States and Florida Constitutions. However, it appears that defendant did not raise this point in the trial court and therefore failed to preserve it for appeal. See Parker v. State; 500 So.2d 721 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Treadway v. State, 500 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Maldonado v. State, 498 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Johnson v. State, 495 So.2d 188…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Webber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Treadway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Beahn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bostic v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Arnold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987