Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Courtney

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1952No. 6213PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Appellee, M. E. Courtney, and J. C. Hooper, father of appellant, Robert Hooper, were stockholders in a corporation known as the Plainview Refining Company. Appellee had invested approximately $9,650 in stock of the corporation and at a later date, the corporation being in failing condition, advanced it $3,000 in cash, for which he was to receive stock, but this stock was not delivered. Appellee Courtney and J. C. Hooper held a note against the corporation in the sum of approximately $7,650, plus interest and charges, and appellee had advanced approximately $4,650 of this loan…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hines v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rosenborough v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cooper v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Jones v. SilerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Gillespie, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  2. Texas Power & Light Company v. LovinggoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Willcockson v. Colorado River Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Womacks v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Reed v. EnrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API