Legal Opinion

Action Electrical Contractors Co. v. Goldin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Determination of the Comptroller, dated October 17, 1983, which, inter alia, found that petitioner had willfully violated subdivision 3 of section 220 of the Labor Law on two occasions, confirmed, without costs, f In subdivision 3 of section 220 of the Labor Law the Legislature has required that supplements be paid to workmen. Undoubtedly, the Legislature realized that if cash payments were given to workmen in lieu of supplements, the cash payments could be quickly dissipated. The workmen would thus be left without any protection against future contingencies which might threaten their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pilot Mechanical Corp. v. CarrollNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Skyway Roofing of Troy, Inc. v. County of RensselaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Dadson Plumbing Corp. v. GoldinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API