Rodriquez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACKSON, Commissioner.
Conviction is for the sale of heroin; the punishment, 85 years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. The evidence showed that appellant sold ten capsules of heroin to Sam J. Roberts, an agent of the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, for $70, on January 29, 1969. The chain of custody of the capsules was established; the chemist, Charles Pyles, testified that he analyzed the capsules and that they contained 5.7% heroin.
Appellant testified at the guilt-innocence stage of the trial, denied the sale, and, in response to questions by his own counsel,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Minor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- George Campbell Painting Corp. v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Antonio Rodriguez v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Ex parte GiaconaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Coats v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Browne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976