Legal Opinion

State v. Chew Muck You

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Multnomah county: L. B. Stearns, Judge. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

— The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of larceny by bailee, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary or the term of one year. To reverse the judgment rendered herein, is the purpose of the present appeal. It is Fust objected that the demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained, for the reason that it does not set outs the. nature and terms of the bailment. In support of this position, People v. Poggi, 19 Gal. 600; People v. Pderwn, 9 Cal. 818, and People v. Cohen, 8 Cal. 42, are cited. These cases hold that it is not enough to *216charge the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Heinicke Instruments Company, a Corporation v. Republic Corporation, a Corporation, and Samuel N. BergmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. State v. KeelenOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Montgomery v. U. S. National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. LucasOregon Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API