Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. American Export Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
By an ex-parte order, American Chain & Cable Co., Inc., was impleaded as a third-party defendant and served with a third-party summons and complaint.
American Chain & Cable Co., Inc., hereafter called American Chain, seeks to vacate the ex-parte order and dismiss the summons and complaint on the ground that there is a misjoinder of parties and causes of action, and that Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, which covers third-party practice, does not apply to the situation here presented.
All the pleadings can be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burris v. American Chicle Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Brown v. CranstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Bohn v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Greenleaf v. Huntingdon & B. T. M. R. & Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Carbola Chemical Co. v. TrundleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Quiles v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Marshall v. Navco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Pyzynski v. New York Cent. R.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946