Legal Opinion
Independent Theatre Owners v. Ark. Public Service Comm.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 5, 1962No. 5-2783PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.
Appellee, Midwest Video Corporation, hereinafter called Midwest, is authorized to engage in the business of furnishing television to subscribers for an agreed consideration. It does not, however, have the facilities to transmit from its studio in Little Rock to customers’ receiving sets in homes or other places, the electrical impulses necessary to produce pictures and sound.
Appellee, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, hereinafter called Southwestern, can furnish the required service, hut refused the application of Midwest for such service until the Arkansas…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Alabama State Board of AssessmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Television Transmission, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Ball v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Associated Mechanical Contractors v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of New York v. Comtel, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Waterville v. Bartell Telephone TV SystemsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- White v. Walnut Hill Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1979
- Allied Telephone Co. v. Ark. Public Service Comm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.