Bishop v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ON RETURN TO REMAND
On original submission, this Court remanded this cause to the trial court with directions that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the appellant had been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial.656 So.2d 394. On July 27, 1994, that hearing was conducted. The appellant was present and was represented by counsel. In addition, this Court has been supplied with the transcript of the hearing held on April 30, 1992, which was not presented to this Court on original submission.
With commendable thoroughness, the trial court entered findings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Apicella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- Parris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Anderson v. MiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007