Legal Opinion

Olmsted v. M'Nall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— The bill in this case was filed by the complainants, to enforce a lien for materials furnished by them for the construction of a building erected by the defendant, M‘Nall,'at the wharf at Evansville. The bill states, that the materials were furnished “ for a building with perpendicular walls and a shingled roof, to be used by the said M‘Nall, at the Evansville landing, as a floating but stationary warehouse and forwarding and commission house, and also as a steam-boat wharf, and for the sale of boat-stores, and occupying a space of 100 feet along the bank of the river, which M(Nall held by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. C. C. Foster Lumber Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. L. C. & Mil. Railroad v. VanderpoolWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Coddington v. BeebeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1863
  4. A. F. Bartlett & Co. v. Steam Dredge No. 14Michigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API