Kitchen v. Clark
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : Clark v. Kitchen, 52 'Mo. 316 ; Burt v. Dewey, 40 N. Y. 283; Curtis v. Groat, 6 .Johns. 168 ; Osterhout v. Roberts, 8 Cow. 43 ; Sanderson v. -Coldwell, 2 Aik. (Vt.)203; Jones v. McNeil, 2 Bailey (S. -C.), 466 ; Sharp v. Gray, 5 B. Mon. (Ky.) 4; Greenl. onEv. (2d ed.) 225 ; Stark v. Kenan, Exr., 11 Ala. 818 ; Pars, on •Con. (2d. ed.) 644; Breed v. Hurd, 6 Pick.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : Clark v. Kitchen, 52 'Mo. 316 ; Burt v. Dewey, 40 N. Y. 283; Curtis v. Groat, 6 .Johns. 168 ; Osterhout v. Roberts, 8 Cow. 43 ; Sanderson v. -Coldwell, 2 Aik. (Vt.)203; Jones v. McNeil, 2 Bailey (S. -C.), 466 ; Sharp v. Gray, 5 B. Mon. (Ky.) 4; Greenl. onEv. (2d ed.) 225 ; Stark v. Kenan, Exr., 11 Ala. 818 ; Pars, on •Con. (2d. ed.) 644; Breed v. Hurd, 6 Pick. (Mass.) 356; Hike v. Clark, 55 Mo. 105 ; Campbell et al. v. Johnson, 44 Mo. 247 ; Speck v. Riggins, 40 Mo. 405 ; Shephard v. Hamp•ton, 3 Wheat. 200; Logan v. Small, 43 Mo. 254. cited: 1 Wag.…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
The respondent asks for a rehearing on two grounds :
1. That the court overlooked section 34, page 347, of. "Wagner’s Statutes, and 43 Mo. 145 (Raithel v. Dezetter), construing that section.
2. That the court erred in treating as res adjudicata the .•ascertainment of the value of the plans by the former suit between the same parties.
1. As to the first point, we are of opinion that there is ■an error in the opinion of the court, as first written, to the •extent of supposing that, as the pleadings stood, evidence •of demand and refusal, or conversion, was necessary. No such evidence, we think,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Raithel v. DezetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869