Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Neal
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1908No. 1779PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Fort Bend County.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown
Certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the First District, as follows:
“This cause is pending before us on appeal. Appellee Neal sued Ed H. Cunningham & Co., a private corporation, and the receiver of its property, for dainages for personal injuries sustained by him.while in the employment of said receiver, and recovered a judgment. The proof shows that at the time of Neal’s injury Ed H. Cunningham & Co., was a private corporation which owned and operated sugar mills and refineries and a paper mill, and was also engaged in farming; that it was not incorporated as a railway…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lodwick Lumber Co. v. E. H. MounceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sullivan-Sanford Lumber Co. v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- Hamilton v. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
- Slaats v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Receivers of Kirby Lumber Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Sid Westheimer Co. v. PinerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.