Cartier v. F. M. Hoyt Shoe Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
The evidence warranted a finding that the tread at the edge of the floor from which the plaintiff stepped to go down the stairway was so worn as to make its condition one of negligent maintenance. She testified: “The top landing was not even. It was grooved in, I would say, about an inch. In other words, the edge of it was worn and looked very slippery looking.” While some wear of stair treads is to be expected and creates no demand for repair, the point at which the wear has become so great as to make the stairs unduly hazardous is one of fact, and the evidence quoted tended to show that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boucher v. LarochelleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holsman v. Darling State Street Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Mitchell v. LegarskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
- Barrett v. Foster Grant Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1970
- Lynch v. L. B. Sprague, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949