Legal Opinion

United States v. Sanchez-Jara

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 3, 2018No. 17-2593PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Easterbrook, Circuit Judge.

Like United States v. Patrick, 842 F.3d 540 (7th Cir. 2016), this appeal concerns the use of a cell-site simulator to locate someone. And like Patrick it does not require us to determine when, if ever, the use of this device must be authorized by a warrant supported by probable cause, for in this case such a warrant was obtained.

The warrant, issued by a federal district judge in July 2015, authorizes federal agents to use pen registers, trap-and-trace devices, historical cell-call records, and "electronic investigative techniques ... to capture and analyze signals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. McIntireCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Artez BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Marquise FiguresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  3. Gire v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Tate v. PollardDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API