Legal Opinion

Comstock v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1950No. 349PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCleary, J.

This is an action for fraud in the sale of real and personal property and the business of conducting an inn for summer boarders. Trial was by jury. The case is here on plaintiff’s exception to the granting of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict and judgment for the defendants made at the close of the plaintiffs’ case.

In passing upon a motion for a directed verdict the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs and the effect of modifying evidence is to be excluded. Appleyard Motor Transportation Co. v. Ray Co., 115 Vt 519, 520, 66 A2d 10. Viewed in this light…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Land Finance Corp. v. Sherwin Electric Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  2. Appleyard Motor Transp. Co. v. Ray Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  3. Tetreault v. CampbellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Eastman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  2. Trumbull Building Center, Inc. v. Buttendorf (In Re Buttendorf)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1981
  3. Batchelder v. Birchard Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  4. Fayette v. Ford Motor Credit CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Gramatan National Bank & Trust Co. v. BeecherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API