Legal Opinion

Gunn v. Patishal

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1873PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Factor’s lien. Trespass. New trial. Before Judge Core. Houston Superior Court. May Term, 1872. For the facts of this case, see the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Warner, Chief Justice.

This was an action of trespass brought' by the plaintiff against the defendants to recover damages for the levy and seizure of two mules of the plaintiff under a pretended lien fi. fa. which was issued against the plaintiff’s husband. On the trial of the case, the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $100 00. A motion was made for a new trial on the several grounds set forth in the record, which was overruled, and the defendants excepted. The evidence in the record shows that the mules were the separate property of .Mrs. Pattishal, and were used by her…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vandalsem v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Simpson v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Eve v. CrowderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  4. Plunkett's School for Boys v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Hathaway v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API