Legal Opinion

Southern Surety Co. v. Farrell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 1926No. 11,458PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Farrell had a judgment on trial to the court against the Southern Insurance Company upon a sickness clause in an insurance policy, and the company brings error. The judgment was right.

The first objection is that the disability was not due to a cause expressed in the policy. The policy provides for payment of sick indemnity only in case the disability is caused solely by a sickness arising after the date of the policy. The point is made by the company that the evidence shows conclusively that, although plaintiff contracted la grippe within three months after said date, yet it appears from his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Insurance v. ManningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wade v. Olinger Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Sentinel Life Ins. Co. v. BlackmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. North American Life Insurance v. KorreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
  4. Santino v. Glens Falls Ins. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Fire Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API