Bradley v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHASANOW, Judge.
In the instant case, Gerrid Kenneth Bradley (defendant) contends that a highly prejudicial, prior inconsistent statement was improperly admitted. We agree with his contention, and because the admission of the statement was not harmless error, we shall reverse his conviction.
I
Bradley was charged in Prince George’s County with kidnapping, armed robbery, use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and related offenses. A jury trial was held on December 4 and 5, 1991. At trial, the State called several witnesses including the victim, Laura Sisk. Ms. Sisk…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- United States v. Roland W. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Theodore D. MorlangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.