Legal Opinion

Bradley v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 8, 1994No. 44, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

In the instant case, Gerrid Kenneth Bradley (defendant) contends that a highly prejudicial, prior inconsistent statement was improperly admitted. We agree with his contention, and because the admission of the statement was not harmless error, we shall reverse his conviction.

I

Bradley was charged in Prince George’s County with kidnapping, armed robbery, use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or crime of violence, and related offenses. A jury trial was held on December 4 and 5, 1991. At trial, the State called several witnesses including the victim, Laura Sisk. Ms. Sisk…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. United States v. Roland W. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. Theodore D. MorlangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API