Legal Opinion
Palmer Russell Co. v. Rothenberg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 4, 1952PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this action by a real estate broker for a commission, there was a verdict for the plaintiff. Exceptions were taken by the defendant to the admission and exclusion of evidence, to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict, and to the refusal of the judge to give certain requested instructions to the jury. The evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff was substantially as follows. The defendant, as sole trustee of the L. S. M. Trust, owned a block of stores at 1703-1711 Beacon Street, Brookline. In the summer of 1947 one McMullen, who was employed by the plaintiff in its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Walker v. RussellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Des Rivieres v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Commonwealth v. GalvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ValliereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Mishara Construction Co. v. Transit-Mixed Concrete Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Gaynor v. LaverdureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Commonwealth v. ArsenaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Henderson & Beal, Inc. v. GlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.