Legal Opinion

Smith v. Crouse-Hinds Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1978No. 3-575A89PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, P.J. —

This is an action for personal injury. The plaintiff, Smith, was injured in an explosion at the plant of his employer, Marbon Chemical Co. He sued Crouse-Hinds, the manufacturer of the electrical switches used in the plant claiming that the switches were defective and unreasonably dangerous because they were constructed so that a metal pin might become disengaged and fall out. At trial Smith attempted to place in evidence such a pin, but it was excluded on objection. The court then excluded evidence from Smith’s expert witness based upon his examination of that pin. At the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McFarlan v. Fowler Bank City Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Owens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Walters v. Kellam & Foley, Mussett, Nicholas & Stevenson, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Bergner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Whitaker v. St. Joseph's HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Clouse v. FielderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Mills v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API