Hamby v. . Cobb Homewood, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctjeiam.
We tbink tbe court below correct in its ruling. Tbe General Assembly of 1931, cb. 274, sec. 5, amended tbe Compensation Act, as follows: “By striking out all of said section and by substituting tberefor tbe following: “Section 40. If tbe deceased employee leaves no dependents tbe employer shall pay to tbe next of kin as herein defined tbe commuted amount provided for in section thirty-eight of this act for whole dependents etc. . . . For tbe purpose of this section tbe term ‘next of kin’ shall include only tbe father, mother, widow, child, brother or sister of tbe deceased.” Tbe…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Scott v. . AumanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- Parsons v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951