Legal Opinion

Andrew J. Gentry III v. Daniel L. Lindsey, Sr.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 15, 2014No. 1121380Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Justice.

Andrew J. Gentry III (“Drew Gentry”) appeals the Lee Circuit Court’s judgment dismissing his claims against Daniel Lindsey, Sr., Jackson Thornton & Co., P.C. (“Jackson Thornton”), Daniel Lindsey, Jr., Justin M. Parnell (“Matt Parnell”), Parnell & Crum, and Wilbur Investments, LLC (‘Wilbur Investments”). For the reasons set forth herein, we conclude that the Rule 54(b) certification was improper, and we dismiss the appeal.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1992, Andrew J. Gentry, Jr. (“Andy Gentry”), petitioned for bankruptcy, pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Andy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dzwonkowski v. Sonitrol of Mobile, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Schlarb v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. CLARKE-MOBILE COUNTIES GAS v. Prior Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Baugus v. City of FlorenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API