Legal Opinion

Carson v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1947No. 46939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

M. S. Ling in 1931 granted Great Lakes Pipe Line Company, appellant, an easement over his land, for construction of a pipe line. Two instruments were executed; a right-of-way agreement and a receipt and release, and which, by their terms, constitute one agreement. Appellant constructed at different times two pipe lines, one a four-inch and one a six-inch line. In 1943 appellant removed the four-inch line and it is for compensation for its removal that appellees brought this action. The' sole question before us concerns the interpretation of the said written agreements.

The case was presented…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nylander v. NylanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  2. Charles Weitz' Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Vorthmann v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Buser v. Grande Avenue Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. In Re Trusteeship of BarnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maytag Company v. AlwardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Darnall v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. In Re Estate of MurdochSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  4. Hubbard v. MarshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. In Re Klepper's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API