Legal Opinion

Snell v. Spalding Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1935No. 10409PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

W. C. Snell brought a suit in equity against Spalding Foundry Company. A general demurrer was sustained, with leave to the plaintiff to amend within ten days; otherwise the petition to be dismissed. Within this period the plaintiff offered an amendment, and later offered a second amendment, each of which was ordered filed subject to objection and demurrer. The defendant demurred generally to each amendment. The court re*583fused to allow either amendment, and dismissed the petition, and the plaintiff excepted. The petition with the proffered amendments alleged the following: During…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Harrison & Garrett v. Wilson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Montgomery v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Cooley v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Garbutt v. MayoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zugar v. ScarbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. County of Bibb v. WinslettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Turner v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Chapman v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. City of Atlanta v. Dekalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API