Harry & Max Dunitz, Inc. v. Meinecke
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Fead, J.'
The suit is for foreclosure of a land contract. Defendants Meinecke claimed fraud, and, on cross-bill, had decree for rescission, with personal judgment against defendants Berger, which was made a lien on the premises, for the difference between payments made on the contract and rental value of the premises. Plaintiff appealed.
Berger sold to Dr. and Mrs. Meinecke on land contract December 10, 1926. The vendor’s interest was conveyed successively to Detroit Parkside Realty Company January 21, 1927, to Michael O’Brien, February 15, 1928, to Max and Harry Dunitz, as individuals,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bennett v. HickeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Dertinger v. LathrupMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015