Legal Opinion
Hansel v. Lamb
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Irad S. Ingraham, J.
Plaintiffs bring the underlying action for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident, alleging the negligence of defendant. Defendant now moves to dismiss the complaint for neglect to prosecute pursuant to CPLR 3216.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The underlying negligence action was commenced by service of a summons and verified complaint in October 1990. Issue was then joined by service of a verified answer with counterclaim on October 26, 1990. Issue was joined on defendant’s counterclaim by service of a verified reply on November 19, 1990, and an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sortino v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Chery v. AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Lichter v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Charlotte Lake River Associates v. American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Mihaly v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gadsden v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007