In re Van Alstine
Washington Supreme Court
Original Application for Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gordon, C. J.
In November, 1898, Lou Van Alstine, one of the petitioners herein, instituted an action in the superior court of King county for divorce on the ground of cruelty. The defendant in that action, Con Van Alstine, answered, putting in issue the charges of the complaint, and by a cross complaint alleged that the marriage was procured by fraud, in pursuance of a conspiracy between the plaintiff and Emma Norton (the other petitioner in this proceeding), and other persons therein named, for the purpose of entrapping “some returning Klondiker” and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Carlton v. CarltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Goodwillie v. MillimannIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Hosack v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
- Clements v. TillmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- In re BinghamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hockley v. HargittWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Decker v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- In re CaveWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Ripon Knitting Works v. SchreiberDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.