Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Williams v. Kennelly

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 24, 1903PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Ineobmation in the nature of quo warranto, brought to and tried by the Superior Court (G-ager, J.') in Fairfield County ; demurrer to replication sustained and judgment rendered for respondent, from which the relator appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHameesley, J.

This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto, filed by the State’s Attorney at the relation of Charles E. Williams, charging the respondent, Patrick Kennelly, with usurping the office of director of public works of the city of Bridgeport. The information alleges that the mayor of Bridgeport, under and in pursuance of the charter of that city, on May 26th, 1900, appointed the relator director of public works for the term of four years from June 1st, 1900, that the relator duly qualified and entered upon the duties of the office, and that the respondent has since May 19th, 1902,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People, Ex Rel. Keech v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Avery v. Studley, MayorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bryan v. Landis, Atty.-Gen'l. Ex Rel. ReeveSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Neuwald v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Sullivan v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  5. Cowan v. State Ex Rel. ScherckWyoming Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API