Schmidlapp & Co. v. La Confiance Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Jurisdiction. Insurance. Corporations. Principal and Agent. Garnishment. Before Judge Hammond. Fulton Superior Court. April Term, 1883 Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
The plaintiffs sued out an attachment returnable to Fulton superior court against J. T. Seltzer & Co., upon the ground that they resided out of the state of Georgia, to-wit, in the state of South Carolina. This attachment was levied by serving J. Gadsden King, alleged to be the agent of La Confiance Insurance Company, of Paris, France, with a summons of garnishment. In answer to this summons, King denied that he was the agent of the Insurance Company, in the legal sense of that term; he stated that he acted as agent of the company for the states of South Carolina and Florida,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Selma, Rome & Dalton Railroad v. TysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reeves v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Louisiana State Rice Milling Co. v. Mente & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Reynolds & Hamby Estate Mortgage Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Associated Press v. United PressSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Cathcart v. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.