Legal Opinion

McFarlin v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 16, 1991No. 90-677PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

An Eckerd pharmacist negligently filled McFarlin’s eye drop prescription with an ear drop solution. She suffered an eye injury when the product was administered according to instructions.

A jury returned a verdict finding that McFarlin had suffered $40,000 in damages based on a loss of business earnings. Eck-erd’s motion for a new trial was granted based on a finding by the trial court that the defendant had been “materially prejudiced by allowing a case to proceed to trial where there have been misrepresentations *182as to the existence of tax returns.” McFarlin, through her attorney, had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. FarleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Roberto v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Central Taxi Service, Inc. v. GreenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Roma Construction Co. v. GoodmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ACandS, Inc. v. ReddDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Southern Trenching, Inc. v. DiagoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Sledge v. RichardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API