Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Carlton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1985No. 8421DC752PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether the district judge properly granted summary judgment, barring plaintiffs action for equitable distribution as a matter of law. We hold that the district judge erred in granting the summary judgment.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). It is a drastic remedy, not to be granted “unless it is perfectly clear that no issue of fact is involved and inquiry into the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law,” Dendy v. Watkins, 288 N.C. 447, 452, 219 S.E. 2d 214, 217…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dendy v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Matter of Estate of AdameeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Spector United Employees Credit Union v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Buffington v. BuffingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Whitt v. WhittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kaminsky v. KaminskyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Camp v. CampCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API