Legal Opinion · Dissent

United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 3, 2003No. 02-450Published

1Dissent

Janet K. Moore, Special Justice,

dissenting. I respectfully dissent from today’s decision. I would uphold the circuit court’s finding of civil trespass and irreparable harm as well as issuance of the temporary injunction.

Wal-Mart has a no-solicitation policy posted at the entry of every store. The UFCW instituted a nationwide “blitz” of WalMart stores for the sole purpose of soliciting union membership inside Wal-Mart stores. It is undisputed that Wal-Mart allows solicitation for union memberships on its parking lots and the solicitation policy applies only to entry inside Wal-Mart’s stores.

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Deere & Company v. Mtd Products, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Kreutzer v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Allan J. Richardson & Associates, Inc. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. John W. Carson D/b/a/ Johnny Carson Johnny Carson Apparel, Inc. v. Here's Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Esczuk v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API