United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent
Janet K. Moore, Special Justice,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent from today’s decision. I would uphold the circuit court’s finding of civil trespass and irreparable harm as well as issuance of the temporary injunction.
Wal-Mart has a no-solicitation policy posted at the entry of every store. The UFCW instituted a nationwide “blitz” of WalMart stores for the sole purpose of soliciting union membership inside Wal-Mart stores. It is undisputed that Wal-Mart allows solicitation for union memberships on its parking lots and the solicitation policy applies only to entry inside Wal-Mart’s stores.
In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Deere & Company v. Mtd Products, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Kreutzer v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Allan J. Richardson & Associates, Inc. v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- John W. Carson D/b/a/ Johnny Carson Johnny Carson Apparel, Inc. v. Here's Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Esczuk v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.