Legal Opinion
Leysoto v. Mama Mia I., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided February 17, 2009No. 08-60750-CIV-SEITZ/O’SULLIVANPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND CLOSING CASE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES
PATRICIA A. SEITZ, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Javier Leysoto’s Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel [DE-16]. This action arises from alleged violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) committed at the Defendant restaurant, Mama Mia Ristrorante (“Mama Mia”). Plaintiff seeks to certify all customers who received a printed receipt at Mama Mia, on or after December 4, 2006, in violation of FACTA’s provisions…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cornelius Cooper v. Southern CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Leonard J. Klay v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grimes v. Rave Motion Pictures Birmingham, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
- In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Mohamed v. American Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- Hood ex rel. Mississippi v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Legg v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.