Homer L. Bruce Et Ux. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this taxpayers’ suit for refund, the issue is whether certain stock losses should be treated as ordinary losses (rather than capital) because of the provisions of Section 1244 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The District Court determined the losses to be capital and denied the taxpayers’ claim for refund. Bruce v. United States, 279 F. Supp. 686 (S.D.Tex.1968).
The facts are adequately stated in the District Court’s opinion. As to the first three stock issues, the controlling question, as we see it, is whether the definitional requirements of Section 1244 have been met regarding the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. General Geophysical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Mance T. Spillers and Mary J. Spillers v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Bruce v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smyers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
- Edwin C. Hollenbeck and Kathryn J. Hollenbeck, Wade G. Ellis and Anita l.ellis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Elmer W. Anderson and Margaret P. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Starnes v. United States (In Re Starnes)District Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
- Fox v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.