Legal Opinion

United States v. Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1992No. Nos. 91-3187, 91-3199, 91-3200PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

In No. 91-3187 the United States filed an interlocutory appeal, permitted by 18 U.S.C. § 3731, of the district court’s order dismissing Count 10 of the indictment against defendants Deffenbaugh Industries, Inc., and Ronald D. Deffenbaugh. That count charged defendants with willfully and knowingly making and submitting to the Department of Justice “false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and representations about material facts in a matter within the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. In cross-appeal Nos. 91-3199 and 91-3200…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Daniel D. RostenkowskiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Paul D. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. ButlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  5. Alejandro Palmero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API