Thomas v. State

James H. Thomas takes this appeal from a judgment finding him guilty of one count of burglary and one count of grand larceny. The judgment was entered upon a jury verdict.1 On this appeal, Thomas urges error upon the denial of his pro se motions (1) for a continuance and (2) for appointment of substitute counsel on the ground that the court-appointed counsel was unprepared to proceed to trial. Our review of the record shows no error in these particulars. The court, in fact, granted a continuance of several days for the purpose of allowing court-appointed counsel to confer with the defendant.…