Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Contractors Construction Corp. v. Michael Development Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 1968No. 1661Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCross, Judge

(concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part.)

I concur in the opinion as it is applicable to the defendants, Contractors Construction Corporation and City National Bank of Miami Beach, as Trustee.

I must of necessity respectfully dissent to the opinion as it applies to the defendant, Joseph Cohen. Joseph Cohen was joined as a party defendant on the assertion of the plaintiff, Michael Development Corporation, that Joseph Cohen had a claim of interest or claim in lien upon the property sought to be foreclosed by the plaintiff. Plaintiff further asserted that if the defendant had any claim or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Frissell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Spann v. BaltzellSupreme Court of Florida · 1847
  4. Harvey v. J. P. Morgan & Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  5. City of Valparaiso v. LongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API