Legal Opinion

Lord v. Equitable Life assurance Society

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The litigation between the plaintiff and the defendants has heretofore received the attention of the courts (47 Misc. Rep. 187; 109 App. Div. 252); but, an act of the Legislature having subsequently been passed (Laws of 1906, chap. 326) under which the society 'has acted or attempted to act/ the plaintiff by supplemental complaint attacks'the constitutionality of that law and the legality of the steps taken under it, all of which comes before me on demurrer of the defendant to the sufficiency of this supplemental complaint and the previous amended complaint, both being taken together under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . Continental Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Looker v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Trustees of Vernon Society v. HilesNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  5. Barnes v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API