Legal Opinion
D'Imperio v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 1, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-1369PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this case are seeking a declaratory judgment to the effect that they are not liable for hazardous substance cleanup costs under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9607. Further, they seek a declaration that if they contribute to the cost of cleanup, their actions are compensable under § 9607(a)(4)(B). Finally, they wish to enjoin the United States from continuing to refer to their tract of land, which appears on a proposed National Priorities List of hazardous dumpsites, as the “DTmperio…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Artesian Water Co. v. Government of New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- State of NY v. General Elec. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
- Boarhead Corporation v. Edwin B. Erickson, Region Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.