Legal Opinion
MacDonald v. Arrowhead Hot Springs Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1931No. Docket No. 4274PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE THOMPSON (R. L.) Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal from that portion of a judgment which was rendered in favor of the defendant Seth Marshall, in an action for the reasonable value of the services of an architect. It is contended the defendant Seth Marshall is personally liable for the obligation as a promoter of the corporation.
The Arrowhead Springs Company is a duly organized corporation. It owns a large tract of land in Cold Water Canyon near San Bernardino, upon which there is located a number of hot mineral springs. This company was engaged in the business…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burbank v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ex-Mission Land & Water Co. v. FlashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Strause v. Richmond Woodworking Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1909
- Schwedtman v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Carmody v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herbert v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Heintze Corp. v. Northwest Tech-Manuals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Television Events & Marketing, Inc. v. AMCON Distributing Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
- DAVIS WINE COMPANY v. Vina Y Bodega Estampa, SADistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011