Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fisher v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1974No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2Published

1Concurrence

Goldman, J. (concurring).

I concur in affirmance but feel constrained to point out a substantial wrong which has been visited upon appellants. The facts are not in dispute.

The properties owned by both plantiffs are situated within a 101 block area within the City of Syracuse designated as the Syracuse Hill Neighborhood Development Program and there are over 1,600 individual parcels of land within the area. In 1962 the Syracuse Urban Renewal Agency, a department of the city, commenced a comprehensive urban renewal study and made renewal plans for the area in question. The Common Council of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Danforth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Fisher v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In re County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API