Szklowin v. Planning Board
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Albert M. Rosenblatt, J.
Petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding within the four-month limitations period (CPLR 217).
Respondent has moved to dismiss on the ground that the petition was made returnable upon only 19 days’ notice, one day short of the 20 days’ notice provision under CPLR 7804 (subd [c]). The issue is whether this defect is jurisdictional and thereby fatal, despite the absence of prejudice, advantage, or delay.
In Matter of Ready Mix & Supply Corp. v State Tax Comm. (63 AD2d 1004), the Appellate Division, Third Department, upon constraint of Matter of'…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barasch v. MicucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- MATTER OF BD. OF EDUC. v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Stream v. BeisheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Board of Education v. NyquistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Wolford v. CopelonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Common Council of Gloversville v. Town Board of Town of JohnstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Brown v. CasierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Visconti v. PainoNew York Supreme Court · 1987