Legal Opinion

In re Goldin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P. J.

This application for a summary order was instituted by the clients, the appellants. The question before the court Was the amount of the fees due the attorneys for which they asserted a hen upon the proceeds of the settlement in their possession. Jurisdiction to determine this question upon such a proceeding is expressly vested in the court. (Judiciary Law, § 475.) We agree with the conclusions of the learned justice at Special Term that there was no agreement by the attorneys tó render the services for the comparatively trivial sum asserted by the appellants. The litigation and collateral…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Sullivan v. McCannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Waterbury v. EldridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  2. Albright v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API