Legal Opinion
Sesto v. Mielke
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Parley, J.
This proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act seeks to compel the respondent *229Assessor of the Village of Lindenhurst to affix his signature to, and accept for filing, a certain certificate of partial abandonment of a subdivision pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 335 of the Beal Property Law.
Petitioners are the owners of two tracts of land situate on the north side of Sunrise Highway in the Village of Lindenhurst and the Town of Babylon. These parcels are described in two subdivision maps filed in the office of the Suffolk County Clerk in the years 1870 and 1879,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Matter of Small v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Foy Productions, Ltd. v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Matter of Foy Productions, Ltd. v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ignaczak v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1996
- People v. HendersonBuffalo City Court · 1985