People ex rel. Moskoff v. Weinstock
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtE. Ivan Rubenstein, J.
Relator, who, on behalf of the defendants Mallach and Price sues out this writ of habeas corpus, invokes- the legal principle that no one shall twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense. (N. Y. Const., art I, § 6; Penal Law, §§ 33, 1938; Code Crim. Pro., §§ 9, 139.)
Indicted heretofore on a felony charge of abortion (Penal Law, § 80), such defendants stood trial in the County Court of Queens County, as a result of which such charge against the defendant, Marie Price, was dismissed. As against the defendant Elizabeth Mallach, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
Under an information…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
- Lohman v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- People v. SkarczewskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- People v. SilvermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
- People v. CornierNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- People ex rel. Di Lapo v. TutuskaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Mack v. Court of General SessionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- People v. FennellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.