Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Moskoff v. Weinstock

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtE. Ivan Rubenstein, J.

Relator, who, on behalf of the defendants Mallach and Price sues out this writ of habeas corpus, invokes- the legal principle that no one shall twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense. (N. Y. Const., art I, § 6; Penal Law, §§ 33, 1938; Code Crim. Pro., §§ 9, 139.)

Indicted heretofore on a felony charge of abortion (Penal Law, § 80), such defendants stood trial in the County Court of Queens County, as a result of which such charge against the defendant, Marie Price, was dismissed. As against the defendant Elizabeth Mallach, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.

Under an information…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  3. Lohman v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. People v. SkarczewskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. People v. SilvermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. De Sisto, New York County Courts1961
  2. People v. CornierNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People ex rel. Di Lapo v. TutuskaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Mack v. Court of General SessionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  5. People v. FennellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API