Patrick v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellant was found guilty of kidnapping, burglary, aggravated assault, and battery. He makes two arguments on appeal. We do not reach the first, there is no merit in the second, and, accordingly, we affirm.
Appellant’s first point of appeal does not specify a trial court error, but merely states, “Appellant was not identified beyond a reasonable doubt as a perpetrator.” The argument is based either on appellant’s motion to suppress the witnesses’ identification of him, or on the sufficiency of the identification evidence; but, in either event, is procedurally barred.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Free v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Parette v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Middleton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Tester v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.