Legal Opinion

McCrary v. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1928No. 17909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The plaintiff brought a prior action against the Western & Atlantic Railroad, and a judgment sustaining a general demurrer to that suit was affirmed by this court. McCrary v. Western & Atlantic Railroad, 35 Ga. App. 641 (134 S. E. 347). The defendant in that ease had offered no reward, and was, of course, not bound by the offer of the Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway. A person offering a reward may prescribe whatever terms he sees fit, and these terms must be substantially complied with before any contract arises between him and another who *674claims the reward. The offer of the reward…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. West Chicago Street RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Stephens v. FulfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  4. Williams v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Law v. McCordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API